17th January 2014

Rangers’ Dangers: Are the Players Standing Firm?

Recent reports suggest that the Rangers squad have been asked to take a 15% pay cut as a result of the £14.3 million losses which were announced by the Club last year.  Yesterday afternoon, Rangers’ first-team apparently rejected this pay-cut proposal. 

As an employment lawyer, this begs the question as to what employers can do in situations where they need to drastically reduce their cost base and limit any continuing liabilities. 

In these circumstances, an employer has three clear options:

Agree a pay cut with its employees

A contract of employment is an agreement between both employee and employer.  This contract can only be changed with the agreement of both parties.  If an employer wishes to reduce an employee’s salary, it requires to obtain that employee’s consent before doing so.  If an employer were to unilaterally (without the employee’s agreement) change a material term of an employee’s contract, that employee could be entitled to treat himself as constructively dismissed and receive compensation for his losses from an employment tribunal.  For this reason, an employer would require to agree any proposed variation to the contract with the employee if it wanted to avoid such a claim. 

Dismiss and re-engage employees on different terms and conditions

An alternative would be for an employer to give notice to its employees that their existing terms and conditions were to be terminated and, after this notice period had expired, the employees could be re-engaged on different terms and conditions.  This “dismissal and re-engagement” procedure could still be challenged by an affected employee although it would be claim of unfair dismissal.  An employer could successfully resist such a claim if it could demonstrate that it had good business reasons for the dismissal and re-engagement.  Such business reasons could include the survival of the business, a much-needed increase in its efficiency or an essential reduction in costs.  A tribunal could also take into account whether or not the employee acted reasonably in rejecting the proposed change when deciding if the dismissal was fair.  If employers are seeking to conduct this type of exercise, they should be taking legal advice about it before commencing the procedure.   

Conduct a redundancy exercise to reduce ongoing liabilities

The statutory definition of redundancy includes the situation where the requirements for employees to carry out work of a particular kind have ceased or diminished or are expected to cease or diminish.  This would include the scenario where an employer is suffering losses and requires to re-organise the business in order to allow it to survive.  Before carrying out such redundancies, the employer will require to consult with the affected employees. Depending on the number of proposed redundancies, the consultation requirements might include having to elect employee representatives as well as providing basic information about the proposed redundancies to affected employees.  Ultimately the employer will require to meaningfully consult with the employees before taking the decision to dismiss.  Redundant employees will also be entitled to receive a statutory redundancy payment, where applicable. 

As far as the “Teddy Bears” problems go, it certainly does not sound as though they are having a picnic in the Ibrox Board Room.  The next few weeks might include a series of financial keepie-ups for the club until one of the above options is agreed.

I would expect that Rangers fans will want the situation resolved as soon as possible so as to avoid a repeat of the events which occurred in 2012. 

Clearly Rangers will require to carefully consider all of their options before taking any decisive action.

Simon Allison
Partner – Employment Law

The opinions expressed in this site are of the author(s) only and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Blackadders LLP.

Blackadders takes all reasonable steps to ensure that the content of this site is accurate and up to date. The site is not, however, intended as a substitute for seeking legal or other professional advice but rather as an informative guide to the services provided by Blackadders and topical legal developments. Site visitors should always seek advice tailored to their specific situation. Consequently, Blackadders accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage suffered by anyone acting or failing to act on the basis of information contained on this site. Downloading of material contained on this site is at the user’s own risk and all necessary virus checks must first be carried out by the user. Blackadders is not responsible for the material found on any web sites linked to this one and links to this site may only be made with Blackadders prior consent.


Blackadders owns the copyright in this blog and all material contained on it. The material on this site may be downloaded for personal use only and must not be altered. Otherwise, Blackadders’ written consent is required before any material on this site is reproduced, copied or transmitted in any way.

Privacy Statement

Information passed to us via this site is kept confidential and will not be disclosed to third parties except if authorised by you or required by law.

© Blackadders LLP 2022

Members of the Law Society of Scotland.

Blackadders Solicitors is a trading name of Blackadders LLP, a limited liability partnership, registered in Scotland No SO301600 whose registered office is 30 & 34 Reform Street, Dundee, DD1 1RJ. Reference to a ‘partner’ is to a member of Blackadders LLP.

Back to Business Legal News from Blackadders Solicitors