31st July 2019

‘Non-traditional’ trade marks

On 14 January 2019 the legislative framework of intellectual property law in the UK was updated, following an update to the law at EU level. This provided for the removal of the requirement for trade marks to have ‘graphical representation’, typically either a word or a logo. This may seem a minor change, but it has allowed trade mark law to move forward, and to progress with technology, as it allows the registration of what are termed ‘multimedia’ trade marks.

This change was no doubt based on companies having increasingly specific, digital-based methods of branding and identifying themselves to consumers – methods and marks they are aware consumers identify with their brand and, therefore, want to protect. It is perhaps no surprise then, though no less significant, that the first trade mark for a ‘motion’ was granted recently to Toshiba for a 1-second clip of their logo surrounded with polygons, forming origami.

It has been speculated that the granting of this trade mark is likely to give rise to a surge in applications for other ‘motion marks’ as well as other types of ‘non-traditional’ trade marks such as ‘sound marks’. It is expected that such applications will come from technology-based sectors who place more reliance on such methods of branding in their marketing, and are likely to be quicker to appreciate the opportunity such a trade mark would give them. That being said, there are a diverse range of sectors that use such methods of branding so there may well be a general uptake in the applications for ‘multimedia’ trade marks through many industries.

It is worth noting that this is not the first trade mark application to be picked up in the press, and there have been some much more bizarre trade marks over the years. Let’s take a look at some of what could be considered the best three.

The first is from 1994, when darts manufacturer Unicorn Products Limited applied to register a trade mark for ‘the strong smell of bitter beer applied to flights for darts’. This was the third application for a smell trade mark, with the previous two being rejected. There was another application around that time for the ‘floral fragrance/smell reminiscent of roses as applied to tyres’ which was applied for by Goodyear Dunlop Tyres UK Limited. Both of these applications were accepted for registration, and still remain registered at the time of writing.

The second notable case is that of Cadbury and their long-running attempt to protect what they see as the unique purple colour, named ‘Pantone 2685C’, used in their chocolate packaging. Cadbury originally held this trade mark since 1995 for use as colour on confectionary products only, however they later attempted to widen the trade mark to cover the usage of the colour as ‘the predominant colour applied to the whole visible surface, of the packaging of goods’. This was challenged by their competitor, Nestle, and the Court of Appeal rejected Cadbury’s arguments as being too vague. It is worth noting that the Cadbury fiasco was part of an equally long-running dispute between Cadbury and Nestle – the latter of whom then lost a trade mark appeal in 2018, in an attempt to trade mark the alleged ‘unique’ four-fingered appearance of their KitKat chocolate bar – which was objected to by Cadbury. Interestingly, the argument put forward by Cadbury in their objection to Nestle was that the shape of the KitKat was not for branding, but rather for the purpose of achieving ‘a technical result’ – the resulting presumably being the ability to break the fingers off into individual pieces.

The third interesting trade mark is that belonging to Olympic long-distance runner Mo Farah (or more accurately his company) who owns the trade mark for his distinctive ‘Mobot’ symbol. Originally, the symbol was performed by BBC presenter Clare Balding, as a suggestion of a victory symbol for the athlete. It was then used by Farah and became popular following the London 2012 Olympics, following which the trade mark filing was made in December 2012, and accepted in August 2013. The trade mark is the silhouette of the symbol.

In short, it is safe to say that people and organisations are finding more modern and unique ways to identify themselves and market their brand, and trade mark law is changing to accommodate this – though perhaps not at a pace as fast as the branding sector is developing itself. Some are quicker than others to attempt to trade mark what they see as a unique selling point of their brand – which can lead to some interesting applications being submitted.

For help and advice on trade marks, or any other corporate law related matters please speak to a member of the Blackadders Corporate & Commercial Team.

Stephen Annis, Trainee Solicitor
Corporate & Commercial
Blackadders LLP
@CoCoStephenA

www.blackadders.co.uk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The opinions expressed in this site are of the author(s) only and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Blackadders LLP.

Blackadders takes all reasonable steps to ensure that the content of this site is accurate and up to date. The site is not, however, intended as a substitute for seeking legal or other professional advice but rather as an informative guide to the services provided by Blackadders and topical legal developments. Site visitors should always seek advice tailored to their specific situation. Consequently, Blackadders accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage suffered by anyone acting or failing to act on the basis of information contained on this site. Downloading of material contained on this site is at the user’s own risk and all necessary virus checks must first be carried out by the user. Blackadders is not responsible for the material found on any web sites linked to this one and links to this site may only be made with Blackadders prior consent.

Copyright

Blackadders owns the copyright in this blog and all material contained on it. The material on this site may be downloaded for personal use only and must not be altered. Otherwise, Blackadders’ written consent is required before any material on this site is reproduced, copied or transmitted in any way.

Privacy Statement

Information passed to us via this site is kept confidential and will not be disclosed to third parties except if authorised by you or required by law.

© Blackadders LLP 2011

Members of the Law Society of Scotland. Authorised to conduct Investment Business under the Financial Services & Markets Act 2000 by the Financial Services Authority.

Blackadders Solicitors is a trading name of Blackadders LLP, a limited liability partnership, registered in Scotland No SO301600 whose registered office is 30 & 34 Reform Street, Dundee, DD1 1RJ. Reference to a ‘partner’ is to a member of Blackadders LLP.

Back to Business Legal News from Blackadders Solicitors