4th November 2014

TUPE – Relocation, Relocation…

The Transfer of Undertakings Regulations 2006 (“TUPE”) operate to protect the rights of employees in situations where businesses or contracts change hands.  The general rule is that where there is a change of employer, the employees transfer to the new employer on the same terms and conditions of employment as they enjoyed with the old employer.

Where a TUPE transfer involves or would involve a substantial change in working conditions to the material detriment of any employee who would transfer, such an employee can treat the contract as having been terminated and the employee shall be treated as having been dismissed by the employer.  This is regulation 4(9) of TUPE.  This regulation is not to be confused with regulation 4(11) which provides that an employee can resign in response to any repudiatory/fundamental breach of contract by the employer (and then claim constructive dismissal).  The two concepts are similar with the distinction being that a claim under regulation 4(9) does not require any breach of contract.

In Cetinsoy and ors v London United Busways Ltd, the EAT held that a change of base for bus drivers was neither a substantial change in working conditions nor a fundamental breach of contract for constructive dismissal purposes.  Following a TUPE transfer, a bus depot was no longer available and the transferring employees were required to work at another depot some 3.5 miles from where they worked pre-transfer.  The employment contracts contained mobility clauses which allowed the employer to vary the location at which the employees worked (with a number of locations listed in the contract).  The new location at which the drivers had to work post-transfer was not included in the contracts because of course this was a location operated by the new employer and not the old employer (the employment contracts having originally been with the old employer).

The EAT observed that the substantial change and fundamental breach of contract issues were interlinked in that they both related solely to the change in workplace location.  The EAT upheld the employment tribunal’s original finding that there was no substantial change in working conditions and no fundamental breach of contract.  The Judge made a factual assessment of travel within London and found that the drivers would face no more than 30 minutes travel time as a result of the change.  This was not substantial, particularly bearing in mind that the other locations at which the employees could have been required to work under the contract were further away than 3.5 miles.

TUPE cases involving changes in location invariably turn on their facts.  The   Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 came into force on 31 January this year.  Among the changes introduced by the 2014 regulations was the inclusion of changes in workplace location to the types of contract changes permitted by TUPE (economic, technical or organisational changes – “ETO”).  Notwithstanding that a change in location could be an ETO, it is still open for employees to argue that a change in location is a substantial change and/or a fundamental breach of contract.

Jack Boyle
Senior Solicitor – Employment Law
@EmpLawyerJack
www.blackadders.co.uk

 

 

The opinions expressed in this site are of the author(s) only and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Blackadders LLP.

Blackadders takes all reasonable steps to ensure that the content of this site is accurate and up to date. The site is not, however, intended as a substitute for seeking legal or other professional advice but rather as an informative guide to the services provided by Blackadders and topical legal developments. Site visitors should always seek advice tailored to their specific situation. Consequently, Blackadders accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage suffered by anyone acting or failing to act on the basis of information contained on this site. Downloading of material contained on this site is at the user’s own risk and all necessary virus checks must first be carried out by the user. Blackadders is not responsible for the material found on any web sites linked to this one and links to this site may only be made with Blackadders prior consent.

Copyright

Blackadders owns the copyright in this blog and all material contained on it. The material on this site may be downloaded for personal use only and must not be altered. Otherwise, Blackadders’ written consent is required before any material on this site is reproduced, copied or transmitted in any way.

Privacy Statement

Information passed to us via this site is kept confidential and will not be disclosed to third parties except if authorised by you or required by law.

© Blackadders LLP 2011

Members of the Law Society of Scotland. Authorised to conduct Investment Business under the Financial Services & Markets Act 2000 by the Financial Services Authority.

Blackadders Solicitors is a trading name of Blackadders LLP, a limited liability partnership, registered in Scotland No SO301600 whose registered office is 30 & 34 Reform Street, Dundee, DD1 1RJ. Reference to a ‘partner’ is to a member of Blackadders LLP.

Back to News & Legal updates