Between dressing up in long black gowns and uttering bizarre Latin phrases that make no sense to anyone but themselves, lawyers and would-be witches and wizards have much in common.
It is therefore unsurprising that I, like many of my colleagues, have been eagerly anticipating the release of the next Harry Potter book this summer. However, having poured through the series so far it may be that the school board of Hogwarts could use some legal assistance of their own.
As a place of learning and care of young adults Hogwarts certainly has some serious health and safety issues with giant spiders, forbidden forests and a chamber inhabited by a man-eating basilisk to name but a few.
Owners of a building are required to take reasonable care to ensure that the premises are safe for visitors. This includes ensuring that public areas and access points are kept free from hazards as far as reasonably possible. If it is proved that the school board knew, or ought to have known, of the existence of these hazards and it can be demonstrated that they failed to take adequate steps to either remove the hazard or prevent access to the hazardous area, they will likely be facing a wealth of personal injury claims in the not too distant future.
On the subject of the Hogwarts castle, whilst the actual ownership of the building is never explored within the books, if the castle has been leased to the school there may be some real difficulties ahead.
Readers will know that following the Battle of Hogwarts the school was in a very sorry condition; staircases destroyed, turrets tumbling down and front doors torn from their hinges. This would have been very costly for the school, because tenants are liable to their landlords for any deterioration in the property during their tenancy.
In commercial leases it is common practice that upon the expiry of the lease a schedule of dilapidations will be prepared and served on the tenant detailing the work required to return the property to the state which it was in prior to the beginning of their tenancy. Until recently, landlords could claim large sums from tenants without ever actually carrying out the repairs. Following the Court of Session’s recent decisions however, landlords must now prove that either the repairs have been carried out or will shortly be carried out before claiming compensation from the tenant.
However, as the castle is the only operating school of witchcraft and wizardry in the country it is to be presumed that the owners will indeed have to carry out these repairs, the cost of which will not be insignificant!
Whilst I am as big a fan of Albus Dumbledore as anyone, his recruitment and HR skills could certainly use some improvement. A host of teachers have been appointed who have either accidentally or deliberately harmed their students.
Employers are liable for any harm that their employees cause whilst that employee is acting within the course of their employment. These acts can include bullying, harassment, discrimination or violence. If an employee is acting in the course of their employment an employer must have taken all reasonable steps to prevent such acts or omissions from occurring. The only saving grace that the school board may have is that the actions of the teachers, such as attempting to wipe their students memory or turn them over to the Dark Lord, are so far from what they were employed to do that they cannot be said to have been working within the scope of their employment. Further, it would surely be argued that it would not have been reasonable to predict that this could occur and therefore they can be excused from failing to put in place the necessary safeguards. However, simply claiming that the position is ‘cursed’ just won’t cut it in court!
If you have any questions arising from the contents of this blog or wish to speak with a solicitor concerning a dispute you are currently experiencing please contact our Dispute Resolution Team who will be happy to assist you.
The opinions expressed in this site are of the author(s) only and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Blackadders LLP.
Blackadders takes all reasonable steps to ensure that the content of this site is accurate and up to date. The site is not, however, intended as a substitute for seeking legal or other professional advice but rather as an informative guide to the services provided by Blackadders and topical legal developments. Site visitors should always seek advice tailored to their specific situation. Consequently, Blackadders accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage suffered by anyone acting or failing to act on the basis of information contained on this site. Downloading of material contained on this site is at the user’s own risk and all necessary virus checks must first be carried out by the user. Blackadders is not responsible for the material found on any web sites linked to this one and links to this site may only be made with Blackadders prior consent.
Blackadders owns the copyright in this blog and all material contained on it. The material on this site may be downloaded for personal use only and must not be altered. Otherwise, Blackadders’ written consent is required before any material on this site is reproduced, copied or transmitted in any way.
Information passed to us via this site is kept confidential and will not be disclosed to third parties except if authorised by you or required by law.
© Blackadders LLP 2011
Members of the Law Society of Scotland. Authorised to conduct Investment Business under the Financial Services & Markets Act 2000 by the Financial Services Authority.
Blackadders Solicitors is a trading name of Blackadders LLP, a limited liability partnership, registered in Scotland No SO301600 whose registered office is 30 & 34 Reform Street, Dundee, DD1 1RJ. Reference to a ‘partner’ is to a member of Blackadders LLP.